This piece reminded
me of a phenomenon called "brain drain," which usually occurs in
developing countries, where those with higher education and technical knowledge
often leave their countries perhaps for economic opportunity, political
stability, or improved living conditions. This large-scale emigration of human
capital slows the growth of the developing country. When I was in Haiti last
summer, one thing I noticed was that many of the kids my age that I talked to
had dreams of going to school in America or eventually living there. While I
would wish the same if I had more limited opportunities – and there is no way
for me to really imagine myself in their positions – this whole idea seems kind
of sad. While migration might improve one of their lives individually, in the
end, it just contributes to the cycle of poverty.
Gummy Vite (n.) a children's multivitamin cleverly disguised as a delicious gummy bear; it tricks children into enjoying their vitamins and forces them to question the definition of candy as they know it.
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Migration and Brain Drain
In the AP prompt we
read this week, Sanders argues that the American culture is so dependent on the
idea of "uprooting ourselves" in migration in the name of exploration
that it rejects the notion of finding virtue in "Making a Home in a Restless
World." He demonstrates that the constant need for movement or for
something "beyond" that is so central to the American Dream can be
unhealthy not only for the individual but also for the earth. However, he also
concedes that the growth of this movement-centered ideology may be inevitable.
Saturday, March 2, 2013
Informal Post: "Tackling Asian Privilege"
I was looking up news sources and
their slants for my Government class, when I came upon this article: http://takimag.com/article/tackling_asian_privilege_gavin_mcinnes#axzz2MOowtiXk
Not only is this article in direct
parallel with Staples' "Black Men and Public Space," but I found it was also intriguing in that it explores (and deplores) the status of
Asians in America.
I'm fairly certain that McInnes was satirizing white supremacists and their paranoia
of the "rise" of other races...his very argument, that Asians are
banding together to exploit the system and oppress other minorities (and
whites), is so ridiculous that I can't comprehend that he -- or anyone -- could truly
believe it. He even states that ideally, Asians should actually be
"penalized" for their "latent inequality," which is the
privilege that they gain by "simply existing."
Side note: Harrison Bergeron. Just saying.
However, after reading the comments
section (only read them if you want to feel like stabbing your computer),
I realized that many did take his argument as serious...and were willing
to construct essay-long comments in order to argue that Asians had contributed
nothing to society in comparison to Europeans, or that incompetent minorities
using affirmative action are taking all the jobs from highly competent whites.
In the end, it doesn't even matter that much whether McInnes meant it or not; the fact that there are people in the world who are
defending this argument at all troubles me.
"Asians haven't risen, they've been lifted at white's expense." -Equality64
Friday, March 1, 2013
The Meaning of Life
In "The Death of the Moth," Woolf ponders the meaning of life while observing a helpless moth -- trapped in its windowpane during the
daytime, the moth is unable to receive the full benefits of the
"clamor" and excitement of the outdoors that it yearns so dearly to
be a part of. She parallels the moth's struggle to live to the same struggle
fought by all mankind and attests that this struggle, while admirable, is
somewhat pitiable. In Woolf's depiction of the moth's futile attempts against
the inevitable force of Death, she ultimately poses the question: Is there
meaning to life?
A
plethora of links to stimulate thought:
Leading
scientist and scholars answer the question, "Does the Universe have a
purpose?
Neil
deGrasse Tyson's answer in video form, illustrated by minutephysics:
On a related note, here's a selection from Carl Sagan's famous "Pale Blue
Dot" monologue (shout-out to Sneha!):
Finally,
a short (4 min) film by Mischa Rozema using NASA footage and sci-fi imagery (I
recommend full screen):
http://vimeo.com/58626695
I do think there is meaning to life; the very fact that people are constantly in pursuit of purpose is what gives it meaning. People do try to examine their lives and find a set of principles by which to live. People do try to do good, make impacts, and to improve the lives of others. Whether these facts are of crucial importance to whatever forces are ultimately dominating the Universe is questionable. However, these facts are important to us, and, to us, their meanings are very real. And, after all, aren't we the ones experiencing life?
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Marriage??
In "Marrying
Absurd," Joan Didion exposes the deterioration of the institution of
marriage to accommodate convenience above values. In Las Vegas, marriage is
treated like fast food; drive-thru ceremonies are offered for under $20 and are
open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. In these cases, Didion argues, the meaning
of marriage goes unappreciated as people are swept under the influence of
passion (or alcohol) and marry under impulse, rather than to celebrate a
meaningful relationship.
After reading Didion's piece, much of the dating/marriage culture in America seems kind of ludicrous. We see dating shows like "The Bachelor" and find it completely normal that ten girls are essentially dating the same guy at the same time while living in the same house. We even find ourselves rooting for certain people, judging who would look good together and who is really "in love" on a reality television show.
There is so much emphasis placed on "finding true love" in our culture, as evidenced by the burgeoning Disney princess movie/chick flick market to the millions of dollars made on the dating website industry. Love is (for lack of a better word) so romanticized in our culture, it's hard to say what can, in reality, be considered meaningful or not.
At its essence, a wedding is the celebration of a contract of commitment between two people. However, this contract is cheapened by the fact that divorce is so commonplace, or that it even exists at all. So, why are people scrambling to get married, when the only difference it makes is a ring and a piece of paper? Can’t a promise be kept without it being legally binding? And, going back to Didion’s piece, if you’re going to spend the rest of your life with someone, what difference does it make whether your ceremony is 10 minutes long or 2 days long?
As you can see by this incoherent post, I haven’t completely developed my opinions on these things yet. Keep in mind that this was all written by someone who hopes to meticulously plan out an extravagant wedding after finding her true love…but I’ll get back to you on that.
Some (depressing) statistics about marriage from drphil.com:
After reading Didion's piece, much of the dating/marriage culture in America seems kind of ludicrous. We see dating shows like "The Bachelor" and find it completely normal that ten girls are essentially dating the same guy at the same time while living in the same house. We even find ourselves rooting for certain people, judging who would look good together and who is really "in love" on a reality television show.
There is so much emphasis placed on "finding true love" in our culture, as evidenced by the burgeoning Disney princess movie/chick flick market to the millions of dollars made on the dating website industry. Love is (for lack of a better word) so romanticized in our culture, it's hard to say what can, in reality, be considered meaningful or not.
At its essence, a wedding is the celebration of a contract of commitment between two people. However, this contract is cheapened by the fact that divorce is so commonplace, or that it even exists at all. So, why are people scrambling to get married, when the only difference it makes is a ring and a piece of paper? Can’t a promise be kept without it being legally binding? And, going back to Didion’s piece, if you’re going to spend the rest of your life with someone, what difference does it make whether your ceremony is 10 minutes long or 2 days long?
As you can see by this incoherent post, I haven’t completely developed my opinions on these things yet. Keep in mind that this was all written by someone who hopes to meticulously plan out an extravagant wedding after finding her true love…but I’ll get back to you on that.
Some (depressing) statistics about marriage from drphil.com:
- 88% of American men and women between the ages of 20 and 29 believe they have a soul mate who is waiting for them. University Wire, Louisiana State University
- 60% of marriages for couples between the ages of 20 and 25 end in divorce. National Center for Health Statistics
- 50% of all marriages in which the brides are 25 or older result in a failed marriage. National Center for Health Statistics
Sunday, February 17, 2013
"What a treacherous thing to believe, that a person is more than a person." -John Green
Manning sees his dad as a person so above him -- the
"protector" of the family, always one step ahead so that he can
always catch his son in case he falls. It's hard for Manning to escape that
mindset until he's face to face with him, arm wrestling, and he realizes that
he is going to beat him. All of a sudden, he understands that his father isn't
all-powerful, but human. It is when Manning finally sees his father as an equal
that he is able to fully grasp their love -- this arm wrestling which he once
viewed as a competition is, in reality, a way of communication.
Even though I can't relate with Manning's physical
relationship with his father, I think I really connected with the distance in
their relationship that Manning felt as a child. At the beginning of the story,
he respects his father, but is unsure of his father's feelings and yearns for a
sort of acceptance or approval. However, at the end, their relationship becomes
more tender, and he connects with his father on an emotional level. In this
way, Manning asserts that the most emotionally rewarding type of love exists
between those who consider each other equals. When you place someone on a pedestal, you are prone to turning a
blind eye to any imperfections and imagining him as something he isn't (à la Gatsby and Daisy). At worst, this can lead to your getting hurt by an unhealthy
relationship. At best, it creates a barrier that prevents you from being truly
close with the person.
"Love
isn't about seeing someone as perfect; it's seeing that they aren't perfect and
accepting them and loving them anyway."
-my
friend Shachi
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Chinese-American
Amy Tan's "Fish Cheeks"
discusses the weird place that many Chinese-Americans (or anyone who is stuck
between two cultures, really) inevitably find themselves in -- the place where
they have to either publicly display or deny their affiliation with
"customs" like burping at the table and eating obscure body parts of
animals. The weirdest thing about this place is that I've been there with my
parents.
When I was younger, I viewed my parents as one-dimensional, wholly Chinese, and unaware of the "American ways". I always thought that I was more aware of the cultural differences, and more knowledgeable of the ways I should and shouldn't act. But, more and more, I realize that we're in the same boat, me and my parents -- actually, they are probably in a smaller, more dangerous boat passing through a sea of alligators, as they have obviously faced many more challenges and overcome more alienation than I since they immigrated here in the 80's. And though they have, of course, retained many of the values and habits of Chinese culture (we are a very stereotypically Asian family), their lives are in America. In fact, as of a couple years ago, they have officially lived in America for a majority of their lives. And, in fact, when my mom told me this piece of information, she jokingly asked me whether she was becoming a typical American. Although it doesn't seem like it, my parents are hyper-aware of the way American culture affects their lifestyles as well as their identities. In short, they're Chinese-Americans, too.
I don't think it's a matter of, as Tan puts it, being Chinese on "the inside" and American on the "outside"...I don't even really know what that means. My parents and I are all Chinese on the inside and out, as well as Americans through and through. My parents take care to preserve our culture and make sure my sister and I understand where we come from, but they truly take more care to love us and allow us do what makes our lives fulfilling, outside of any cultural context.
Happy Chinese New Year, by the way.
When I was younger, I viewed my parents as one-dimensional, wholly Chinese, and unaware of the "American ways". I always thought that I was more aware of the cultural differences, and more knowledgeable of the ways I should and shouldn't act. But, more and more, I realize that we're in the same boat, me and my parents -- actually, they are probably in a smaller, more dangerous boat passing through a sea of alligators, as they have obviously faced many more challenges and overcome more alienation than I since they immigrated here in the 80's. And though they have, of course, retained many of the values and habits of Chinese culture (we are a very stereotypically Asian family), their lives are in America. In fact, as of a couple years ago, they have officially lived in America for a majority of their lives. And, in fact, when my mom told me this piece of information, she jokingly asked me whether she was becoming a typical American. Although it doesn't seem like it, my parents are hyper-aware of the way American culture affects their lifestyles as well as their identities. In short, they're Chinese-Americans, too.
I don't think it's a matter of, as Tan puts it, being Chinese on "the inside" and American on the "outside"...I don't even really know what that means. My parents and I are all Chinese on the inside and out, as well as Americans through and through. My parents take care to preserve our culture and make sure my sister and I understand where we come from, but they truly take more care to love us and allow us do what makes our lives fulfilling, outside of any cultural context.
Happy Chinese New Year, by the way.
Sunday, February 3, 2013
New Semester
In “Champion of the World”, Maya Angelou recalls her
community gathering in her grandfather’s Store to listen to Joe Louis’s
championship boxing match. She describes Louis as a symbol of black empowerment
and details the tense feeling of anticipation in the room as they waited for
him to prove that they were “the strongest people in the world.” Despite all
the celebration after the Brown Bomber’s victory, Angelou still notices that it
is still unsafe for them to travel late at night, and that whites still hold
power in determining where blacks go and when. At the end of the story, African
Americans are still distant from attaining equality.
Coming away from this story, I was a little bit
confused about what Angelou wanted us to take away as her opinion on the whole
event. In one aspect, she applauded Louis for being this otherworldly symbol of
power for her race, but at the same time, she ended the passage on a borderline
pessimistic note. It’s hard to say whether she aimed to give readers hope or
dash their hope to pieces by asserting that victories like Louis’s do nothing
to further Civil Rights. However, the fact that Angelou’s take on the memory is
so multi-dimensional is what makes her autobiography so realistic to me, even
if I’ve never been a black girl growing up in the South. After all, no
impactful experience in my life has ever been exclusively positive or negative,
so there’s no reason for me to expect Angelou’s experiences to be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)